Employer dating policy updating finicial aid
" While the answer to the first question is pretty simple, the answer to the latter is less obvious.The legal issue is what I like to call the "amplification" of potential liability that always exists around the employer-employee relationship.Relationships between supervisors and subordinates create even more potential problems.In a better scenario, coworkers would find it easier to claim that an employee received preferential treatment from a supervisor he or she is dating.But a lot of companies don't let the rank and file decide--they adopt policies that ban or limit workplace dating--all in the name of lowering liability.Enforcing these policies can take their toll on a company. Earlier this year, Best Buy's chief executive, Brian Dunn, stepped down after an investigation by the board discovered he had shown "extremely poor judgment" with a 29-year-old female employee.In a poorer scenario, the relationship would end badly, one of the employees could claim that the relationship was non-consensual, or that sexual harassment existed.An employee could even make a case for unlawful retaliation if he or she receives a poor performance review from a former lover (or if a co-worker receives a better evaluation from his or her boss).
When your routine is work-sleep-work, going out to date does not seem like a real option for many.
Office relationships often also rise out of office friendships, in which mutual trust is already present.
Though traditionally maligned for reasons I’m about to get into, office romance can be beneficial for businesses. Lane III, author of , sees employee dating as a way to increase employee engagement.
Love is in the air alright, but chances are, it’s been there all year long: 56% of business professionals say they’ve been in relationships with coworkers.
That percentage is on the rise, and it’s no surprise: we spend one-third of our lives at work.